Commentary - 01/24/2007

Medical Enslavement - More Proof
(The India-ization of America - Part 3)

Earlier, the essay on Just Another Economic Slave Unit touched upon "The India-ization of America." It was then followed up with Medical Enslavement. Today, after our President's State of the Union speech, Business Week published this article Bush Proposal Could Help Insurance Cos.

Within that article is the following paragraph:

"That proposed incentive could drive many Americans to the individual-oriented plans offered by companies like UnitedHealth, Wellpoint and Aetna, according to Citigroup analyst Charles Boorady."
By looking at the major holders of only these three health insurance companies, as well as the major holders of the analyst's employer, we can see why the word "conspiracy" raises its ugly head. The word "conspiracy" comes from "conspire," which means "to breathe together." So how do they "breathe together?"

Take a look at the work done last June, under Who Controls Our Health Care Companies. You'll see that UnitedHealth, Wellpoint and Aetna are the top three insurance providers. You'll also see that the top 10 institutions control 40.94% of UnitedHealth (out of 867) , 36.24% of Wellpoint (out of 791) and 40.66% of Aetna (out of 540). You will also see that "Barclays and Associates" control the largest chunk of each of these groups. There is no documentation of how much control they have over institutions in the other 90% group.

Now take a look at who controls Citigroup. You'll see that "Barclays and Associates" control 10.35%, with Barclays itself the largest shareholder. Then take a look at who controls McGraw-Hill, which publishes Business Week. There you will see that "Barclays and Associates" control 19.90%. They certainly all "breathe" together, wouldn't you agree?

The point is that YOUR interests are not of THEIR interest. The "psychopaths" that manipulate the earnings and the value of these stocks only care that YOU pay more, so they can pocket more. And more is never enough. That's why these companies are now called "plantations." Nobody that works in these companies, from the chairman of the board downward, owns not even 1%. They are simply "foremen" hired to run the show. That's why they take as much as they can get away with. There is NO loyalty to the company except in posturing for the media.

Even Wall Street acknowledges this by calling the heads of the companies that make up "Barclays and Associates" MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE. "Master" is what they called people running the plantations. The real owners remain hidden, of course.

My point about all this is that "Snakes in Suits" will come from any political party. This shows that our past election was a REAL confrontation between good and evil that rested upon your vote. This was not about Republicans, Democrats or any other political party. It was a choice between having a "representative that truly represents" or a "psychopath with an attache case." Conscience vs no-conscience.

Now that this new group of elected representatives head toward power, are they simply going to further the ambitions of the REAL "plantation owners?" Again?

Have they already us sold out? Again? For God's sake, I hope not!

I believe that this old 1889 book, "The Great Red Dragon," with the sub-title "Foreign Money Power In The United States," had answers to those questions then, and the pattern exists to the present. There is truly a force to be reckoned with, which had its beginnings over 400 years ago, that has been re-trying ever since to meet its goal, stated in its mission statement: "... to "own the earth in fee simple."

One last thing: If you found this information valuable, please help support this site so that this information stays available for those who will pass this way after you.

2007 by Edward Ulysses Cate

Help Support This Site
Commentary Index: